When diagnosing a binding sunroof, which technician's assertion is correct?

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Prepare for the ASE Non-Structural Analysis and Damage Repair Test with our comprehensive quiz. Access flashcards and multiple choice questions, complete with hints and explanations. Ace your exam with us!

When diagnosing a binding sunroof, the assertion that indirect damage is a possible cause is correct. Indirect damage can occur from various sources, such as previous accidents, poor repairs, or wear and tear that may not be immediately obvious. These factors could impede the sunroof's movement or alignment, leading to a binding issue. For instance, if the frame around the sunroof was damaged or misaligned during an accident, it might affect the sunroof's operation even if the sunroof itself is functioning properly.

On the other hand, attributing the binding issue to a weak battery disconnects the problem from the mechanical and structural aspects of the sunroof. While a weak battery can cause electrical components to malfunction, it is less likely the direct cause of a mechanical binding issue unless there are specific symptoms related to the electrical operation of the sunroof that are observed. Therefore, the focus on indirect damage as a possible cause helps address the typical mechanical and structural factors to consider during such diagnoses.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy